Ask in plain language.
A cited answer from your approved docs, or an honest “not documented yet.”
Cuts the back-and-forth before a spec stalls.Arm your whole channel with your best technical specialist, so complex products get specified and sold.
Can this battery support a 200A panel with two EV chargers?
Yes, within limits. Two 48A EVSE on load management stay inside the panel's rated busbar capacity.
You can't train every rep, contractor, and engineer to sell and spec a complex product, so it gets designed out for whatever is easier, and you never see the questions your channel keeps asking.
Ask it anything, and it answers from your approved docs with a citation behind every number, so your hardest product gets specified and sold by everyone who moves it.
Your approved datasheets, manuals, rules, and warranty language, kept current to the latest revision.
A technical specialist's judgment: it answers, sizes, and checks, cites every number, and says so when your docs can't, never inventing the value.
A cited, audit-defensible answer and a submittal-ready spec sheet.
Specialist-level technical depth and sole-source spec defense.
A one-line cited fact, ready to paste into a text.
ROI and payback in plain business language.
A cited answer from your approved docs, or an honest “not documented yet.”
Cuts the back-and-forth before a spec stalls.Can the Voltcore V200 support a 200A panel with two EV chargers?
Yes, within limits. Two 48A EVSE on load management stay inside the panel's rated busbar capacity.
Voltcore V200 Install Manual, Rev D, p.12 Table 4
Load management enabled per installer configuration.
Product manuals, tables, compatibility rules, warranty language, and application notes.
Sizing, compatibility, load management, and configuration logic runs outside the model.
The response carries the cited source, the approved revision it is current as of, assumptions, and any unresolved gaps.
"Continuous main bus rating: 200 A."
No span, no value. The chain is the proof.
It drafts only from sources you approve and shows your engineer the exact citation to check. Nothing ships until they sign off, so your brand never carries an answer your team didn't stand behind.
The draft arrives with its exact source span. Your engineer confirms the citation and approves it, or sends it back.
An answer can only ground on sources your team approved, and an approved answer never changes underneath them.
Approve once, reused from then on, so only genuinely new questions reach your bench.
Which 200 A panel supports two 48 A EV chargers within busbar rating?
Busbar headroom depends on the specific load center and its listing. You would need to confirm the rating against each manufacturer's own documentation.
Which 200 A panel supports two 48 A EV chargers within busbar rating?
The Voltcore V200 carries a 200 A busbar rated for two 48 A EVSE within its rated headroom, per the manufacturer's published specification.
Presence and accuracy are measured, not promised.
Not generic FAQ automation. It's for complex grid-edge products, batteries, inverters, smart panels, EV charging, controls, sold through reps, distributors, and the engineers who spec them.
If two or more sound like you, a pilot will show the rest.
Reps sell the complex product as easily as a simple one, and warm spec-stage leads route to your own sales org.
See what your channel actually asks, and keep every field answer aligned to your approved, current claims.
Offload the questions you have answered a hundred times; approve answers, never author them from scratch.
See how your product is really bought and specced, and prove the spend with first-party attribution.
A chatbot guesses when the documents are thin. Cableknit answers only from approved sources, runs the numbers through deterministic tools instead of the model, and returns an honest gap when the source chain breaks. Every answer is cited.
It's marked unresolved, not guessed, and logged as a documentation gap, so leadership sees which gaps are slowing deals instead of finding a bad claim after it reaches a project.
Answers are grounded only in the sources you approve, and your documents are stored and processed in Canada (AWS ca-central-1). Anything you don't want loaded isn't loaded. See Security for the data path.
No, it augments them. It never invents a value and grounds every answer in the sources you approve, so your team stays in responsible charge, and it takes the repetitive, already-answered questions off their plate instead of making engineering decisions.
You do. Answers are bound to the documents, rules, formulas, and warranty language you load. The model explains the path; your source or formula owns the value.
It's a scoped link, no new tool to learn and no login between a rep and a field question. They get one trustworthy, cited answer to paste straight into a customer conversation, so they reach for it instead of escalating.
Every question and every gap is logged, so you see what your channel actually asks, which answers are missing, and where deals stall, the attribution a static catalog never gave you.
One product line and ten questions your channel can't answer cleanly. Your docs don't need to be perfect, mapping the gaps is part of the work, and we build the sourced answers and the deterministic checks.
Bring ten questions your channel can't answer cleanly. We'll show which can be sourced, which need deterministic tools, and which gaps are costing you deals.